Feister v. Hulick
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
At Law. Trespass by Mary R. Leister against George C. Hulick. On rule to set aside service of summons.
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, District Judge.
An outline statement of the facts necessary to an understanding of the questions involved in the case as presented under the present rule is this. The defendant, who is a nonresident of the city of Philadelphia, was the driver of an automobile which struck and killed the husband of the plaintiff. The defendant was arrested and held to answer before a coroner’s jury of inquest He attended the inquest and was discharged. After he had left the building in which the inquest was held he was served with a summons in the present case, which had issued out of one of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Kaufman v. GarnerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1909
- Dwelle v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1912
- Kauffman v. KennedyUnited States Circuit Court · 1885
- Roschynialski v. HaleDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Harris Foundation, Inc. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Hardie v. BrysonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1942
- Ada Dairy Products Co. v. Superior Court, Seminole CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Bramwell v. OwenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1921
- State v. TaranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.