Legal Opinion
Carlon v. Gray
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 17, 1935No. Civ. 5305PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
In this action the plaintiff had judgment restraining the defendant as constable of the third township in and for the county of Tuolumne, from selling a Cadillac tow car and a Chevrolet truck under an execution issued by the Justice’s Court of Sacramento Township, Sacramento County.
On the 31st day of August, 1933, Sacramento board of trade, a corporation commenced an action in the Justice’s Court of Sacramento Township, against the plaintiff in this action. The sum claimed or the amount of the demand in that action was less than the sum of $300, and was within the jurisdiction of justices’…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Jacks v. BaldezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Harris v. Minnesota Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Antilla v. Justice's Court of Big River Twp.California Supreme Court · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Forslund v. ForslundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Douglas v. JanisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Leplat v. Raley Wiles Auto SalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- In Re MeisnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.