Legal Opinion

Smith v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1892No. 15,684PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From- the Allen Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This action was brought to recover for personal injuries sustained by the appellee, while engaged as a laborer in tearing down a bridge, preparatory to the construction of a new one.

The appellee, at the time he was injured, was in the employ of the county, working under the personal superintendence of one of the members of the board of commissioners who had charge of the work.

The court sustained a demurrer to each paragraph of the complaint, and this ruling is assigned as error.

The cause of action is stated in various forms in the several paragraphs. The first and second aver that the member…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hollenbeck v. County of WinnebagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Sherbourne v. Yuba Cty.California Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Symonds v. Board of SupervisorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Abbett v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Board of Commissioners v. RickelIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Board of Commissioners v. AllmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Freel v. School City of CrawfordsvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. James v. Trustees of Wellston TownshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Snyder, Admx. v. MouserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API