Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Stafford v. State Annuity & Investment Board

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchied, J.

Under ch. 459, Laws of 1921, a contract relation exists between the state and the teachers in the edu*33cational system of the state. We consider this proposition definitely settled. State ex rel. O’Neil v. Blied, 188 Wis. 442, 206 N. W. 213; State ex rel. Dudgeon v. Levitan, 181 Wis. 326, 193 N. W. 499. The cases just cited treat with the statute creating the fund upon which the legislature attempted to give the relatrix a claim by enacting ch. 417, Laws of 1933. Ch. 459, Laws of 1921, created contractual relations between certain teachers and the state of Wisconsin, and gave such teachers a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Dudgeon v. LevitanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State ex rel. O'Neil v. BliedWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Phillip v. Public School Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Talbott v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. State Teachers' Retirement Board v. GiesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Crawford v. Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'n of School District Number 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. Smith v. Annuity & Pension BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API