Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS, EIGHTH DISTRICT, OP THE STATE OP OHIO. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice White
The Cuyahoga River Power Company, pláintiff in error, was chartered under the laws of Ohio to build and maintain a system of dams, canals and locks in the Big Cuyahoga River for the generation of electricity for light, heat and other purposes. The corporation was granted authority to acquire by condemnation or purchase .property necessary for the conduct of its business. Iü January, 1911, the Power Company commenced this action against the Northern Realty Company, one of the defendants in error, to condemn a large tract of land ownbd by it adjacent to the river. After the suit was brought…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Klinger v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Bachtel v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Johnson v. RiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Dibble v. Bellingham Bay Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Adams v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Williams v. KaiserSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Lynch v. New York Ex Rel. PiersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Wilson v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Sears v. City of AkronSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Bilby v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.