Adams v. Russell
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of this court to review a judgment of the state court which rests upon non-Federal as well as Federal grounds, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
Error to review the action of the Supreme Court of Michigan, denying plaintiff in error a writ of habeas corpus.
The facts, as alleged in the petition, are these:
Plaintiff in error was convicted in the Recorder’s Court of the City of Detroit of the crime of seduction and, sentenced to imprisonment for not less than two and one-half years and for not more than five years. The case was reviewed by the Supreme Court of the State on a bill of exceptions and a writ of error and the sentence and judgment of the court below affirmed. Pending the writ of error he was released from imprisonment, but…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Eustis v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Klinger v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Bachtel v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Ex Parte SpencerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Johnson v. RiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Williams v. KaiserSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Herb v. PitcairnSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ana Maria Lanza v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Plymouth Coal Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.