Legal Opinion
In Re Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. Erisa Litigation
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 6, 2006No. 5:03 CV 2182, 5:03 CV 2183, 5:03 CV 2209, 5:03 CV 2219, 5:03 CV 2220, 5:03 CV 2262, 5:05 CV 2360, 5:03 CV 2367, 5:03 CV 2588, 5:04 CV 75, 5:04 CV 102PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
ADAMS, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiffs, who are participants in The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Employee Savings Plan for Salaried Employees (the “Salaried Plan”) or The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Employee Savings Plans for Bargaining Unit Employees (the “Bargaining Unit Plan”) brought this action on behalf of themselves and a class of others similarly situated pursuant to Section 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132. Collectively, the Salaried Plan and the Bargaining Unit Plan are referred to as the “Plans.”
Pl…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- In Re Delorean Motor Company, Debtor. David W. Allard, Jr. v. Howard L. Weitzman, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Raymond Pfeil v. State Street Bank and Trust CoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- In Re Regions Morgan Keegan ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
- In Re Ford Motor Co. ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- In Re Regions Morgan Keegan Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
- Dudenhoeffer v. Fifth Third BancorpDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.