Legal Opinion

Vanausdol v. Bank of Odessa

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

— Tins is an action to recover the sum of $1500, -which defendant refused to pay Addison Vanausdol, deceased, one of its depositors. The action is founded upon the allegation that the defendant cashed a forged check in that sum, purporting to have been signed by the said Vanausdol, and refused; upon notification of the forgery to credit his account with said sum. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff and defendant has appealed.

The case was instituted by Addison Vanausdol who died on October 9, 1923, during its pendency and was revived in the name of his son, Frank P.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Turner v. HaarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. State v. DavidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Geer v. Missouri Lumber & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  4. Helfenstein v. MedartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  5. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kirst v. Clarkson Construction CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Bledsoe v. Northside Supply & Development Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Home Insurance Co. of New York v. SavageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Jones v. Missouri Freight Transit Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Hursh v. CrookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API