Legal Opinion

Gatewood v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 25, 1926PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op'the Court by

Judge Sampson

Affirming.

Appellant, Gratewood, complains of a judgment of •conviction on an indictment for perjury, and assigns what he terms several grounds for its reversal. The indictment, he says, was demurrable, and that the court •erred in overruling his demurrer. The complaint is based upon the failure of the indictment to allege that the false oath was “willfully” made and done by bim. The indictment does not employ the word “willfully” but uses the words, “feloniously, falsely and corruptly,” which the Commonwealth insists are sufficient to cover .and embrace the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  2. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. NashIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Whitman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Lissenbee v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Northern Railway Co. of France v. CarpentierNew York Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. CooperSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  2. Sall v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Chancellor v. Hines Motor Supply Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Green v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. BermúdezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API