Legal Opinion · Dissent

Board of Adjustment v. Town of Swansboro

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1992No. 914SC846Published

1Dissent

Judge LEWIS

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s interpretation of N.C.G.S. §§ 160A-146 and 160A-388. These statutes cannot be harmonized as the majority asserts unless the three-year term found in § 160A-388(a) is given effect. The general rule is “[w]here . . . one statute deals with a particular situation in detail, while another statute deals with it in general and comprehensive terms, the particular statute will be construed as controlling absent a clear legislative intent to the contrary.” Merritt v. Edwards Ridge, 323 N.C. 330, 337, 372 S.E.2d 559 (1988) (citation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Merritt v. RidgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Doyle v. Southeastern Glass Laminates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Doyle v. Southeastern Glass Laminates, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API