Legal Opinion

Merritt v. Ridge

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1988No. 12PA88PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The controlling issue in this case is whether the anti-deficiency statute, N.C.G.S. § 45-21.381, bars the holder of a purchase *332money promissory note given by a buyer of real property to the seller and secured by a purchase money deed of trust embracing the property from recovering the costs of foreclosure of the deed of trust and sale of the property and related attorneys’ fees. We conclude that the statute precludes such recovery. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

The facts are largely undisputed in this case. The record reveals that, on 26…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Food Stores v. North Carolina Board of Alcoholic ControlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Ross Realty Co. v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Barnaby v. BoardmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. In Re the Foreclosure of the Deed of Trust or Mortgage of Castillian Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Reavis v. Ecological Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Matter of Foreclosure of Trust by GoforthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Nucor Corp. v. General Bearing Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. In re the Foreclosure of the Deed of Trust of Vogler Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  4. McCullough v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Vanderburg v. N.C. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API