New York State Commission on Cable Television v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Circuit Judge:
Since the inception of the American television era, various ideas, technologies, and services have been developed to enhance the reception of locally-broadcast video signals and to substantially broaden the programming alternatives available to viewers. This case raises the issue of whether the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) lawfully preempted New York State’s regulation of one of those services.
Background
Among the several options available to some television viewers in New York State are programs delivered by master antenna television (“MATV”) systems, by…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- New York State Commission On Cable Television v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- New York State Commission On Cable Television v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- New York Eye and Ear Infirmary v. HecklerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984