Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Nashville Livestock Commission v. Cox

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 16, 1990No. 89-178Published

1ConcurrenceTom Glaze, Justice

I agree with the majority and write only to renew my concurring view in Black v. Riverside Furniture Co., 6 Ark. App. 370, 375, 642 S.W.2d 338, 341 (1982) (Glaze, J., concurring). Black involved a non-work related death case, not a disabling angina case. If the evidence in Black had shown Black’s angina pains had hastened his death, I believe the court would have held the claim compensable. Nonetheless, the medical evidence in Black was lacking in this respect, and the widow’s claim was properly denied.

Here, appellant also relies upon Kempner’s v. Hall, 7 Ark. App. 181, 646 S.W.2d 31 (1983),…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kostamo v. Marquette Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Black v. Riverside Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Kempner's & Dodson Insurance Group v. HallCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  4. Duffy v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Weaver v. FlockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API