Legal Opinion

Oshtemo Charter Township v. Kalamazoo County Road Commission

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 2013No. Docket No. 304986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON RECONSIDERATION

2Per curiam

Plaintiff Oshtemo Charter Township (Oshtemo Township) appeals as of right the circuit court’s order granting summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) in favor of defendants Kalamazoo County Road Commission (the Road Commission), Alamo Township (Alamo Township), and Kalamazoo Charter Township (Kalamazoo Township) on Oshtemo Township’s claim that the Road Commission’s decision to void an Oshtemo Township truck route ordinance under the authority of MCL 257.726(3) was invalid. We reverse and remand.

I. OVERVIEW

Article 7, § 29 of the Michigan Constitution reserves to counties,…

3Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. West Virginia Ex Rel. Dyer v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. People v. IdziakMichigan Supreme Court · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Detroit Public Schools v. ConnMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. People of Michigan v. Reginald Lamarr DavisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Phil Forner v. Tallmadge Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API