Shuler v. Hardin

Hardin, administrator of South, sued Shuler in the court below on two promissory notes.

G. G. Nave, for appellant. P. S. Kennedy, for appellee.

The defendant answered that the consideration of the notes was a part of the purchase money of a lot in Matlock’s addition to the town of Danville; that South, on the 9th of April, 1861, executed his title-bond to Shuler, conditioned that, on the payment of the purchase money, the former would convey to the latter, by quit-claim deed, the lot in question; that, on the 24th of February, 1859, Arthur W. Little and others obtained a judgment against one…