Polo v. Stern
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
To detail the efforts of the judgment creditor to collect his judgment would require an extended opinion and merely indicate that every step known to prevent the collection of a judgment has been practiced here by the defendants. Various applications made by these defendants have been heard by Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Furman, Mr. Justice MacCrate, Mr. Justice Humphrey, and the trial was had before Mr. Justice Cropsey. The defendants have been unable to convince any of the justices before whom these numerous applications were pending as they are unable to convince the undersigned…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nelson v. HirschNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Marlee, Inc. v. BittarNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Mendelsohn v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- In re the Estate of WaxNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- Nelson v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Polo v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- In re the Estate of KramskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- Keesing v. WishnefskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Fingerhut v. HirschNew York Supreme Court · 1943