Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Hirsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order entered October 5, 1933, adjudging defendant Puritz in contempt for failure to comply with final judgment directing the payment of $8,000, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion denied, without costs. The provision in the judgment sought to be enforced as for a contempt is enforcible by issuance of execution. It is not enforcible by proceedings in contempt. Whether or not it is enforcible by execution against the person may not be determined on this record. (S. & N. Trading Corp. v. Amazon Building Corp., 236 App. Div. 739; Wagenheim v. Ocean Parkway…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. S. & N. Trading Corp. v. Amazon Building Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. R. C. Gluck & Co. v. TankelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  2. Polo v. SternNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Keesing v. WishnefskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  4. In re the Estate of GoldowitzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  5. Fingerhut v. HirschNew York Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API