Lee v. . Rowe
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN tried before Daniels, J., September Term, 1915, of Pender, upon these issues: 1. What is the true dividing line between plaintiff’s and defendant’s land? Answer: “From H to the river.” 2. Did the defendant wrongfully and unlawfully trespass upon same or any part thereof? Answer: “Yes.” From the judgment rendered, defendant appealed.
1Per curiam
It was admitted that the plaintiff was the - owner of lot No. 3 in the division of the lands of Thomas Lee, deceased,' and that the defendant was. the owner of lot No. 4 in the division of the lands of Thomas Lee, deceased, and the question in this case was, Where is the true boundary line between the said lots ?
It was admitted that there was not sufficient evidence of adverse possession by the plaintiff and those under whom he claims to ripen title to any part of the said lands outside of the boundaries of the deed.
It is conceded, and also stated in the judgment, that if the jury should find…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clarke v. AldridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Allison v. KenionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Higdon v. . RiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
3Cited by3 opinions
- Klapman v. HookSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
- Dudley v. . JeffressSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Watford v. . PierceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924