Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lehman v. Martin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 9, 1905No. Nos. 14,055—(196)PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Relator in behalf of Arlene Martin petitioned Walter Wakeman, as court commissioner for the county of Lyons, for a writ of habeascorpus against William C. Martin and J. H. Cutler. From his decisIon, after a trial, awarding the custody of the child to the relator until the further order of the court, William C. Martin appealed to the .supreme court.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Respondent is the father of Arlene Martin, a minor child of the age of about four years. About a month after her birth in the year 1900 the mother died, and the child was, with the consent of respondent, .given into the care of relator, her grandmother, the parent of the child’s mother. During this time the parties all resided at Tracy, this state. In 1904 respondent again married, and removed with his wife to Willow City, North Dakota, where he now resides and is engaged in business. He sought to take his child with him, and relator refused to part with her, whereupon respondent took…

2Cited by30 opinions

  1. Wallin v. WallinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. State ex rel. Platzer v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Turkel v. Ramsey County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. In Re Welfare of BarronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Stubblefield v. State Ex Rel. FjelstadTennessee Supreme Court · 1937

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API