Legal Opinion

Empire State Surety Co. v. Cohen

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action upon a bond furnished by a general guardian.

1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.

This action was, by consent of counsel, tried without a jury, the facts being submitted upon oral admission or written stipulation. The plaintiff corporation, which was surety upon the bond furnished by a general guardian, and which has made good to the ward’s estate certain sums of money with which the account of- the guardian has been surcharged, sues the defendant to recover the sum of $5,750, with interest, alleged to have been wrongfully paid to the defendant by the guardian. The ward recovered, in August, 1905, in an action for personal injuries due to negligence, a judgment for upwards…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cochran v. Van SurlayNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  2. Matter of Petition of CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Lockman v. . ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Squire v. . OrdemannNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Mathews v. . AikinNew York Court of Appeals · 1848

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hall v. Windsor Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. American Surety Co. v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Heitman Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  4. Stark v. National City BankNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Hall v. Windsor Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API