Legal Opinion

Tina Richardson, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent Caleb Slay v. United States of America, et al.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided March 2, 2026No. 6:23-cv-03337Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION TINA RICHARDSON, individually and as ) successor-in-interest to Decedent Caleb Slay, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 6:23-cv-03337-RK ) UNITES STATES OF AMERICA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Before the Court are Defendant United States’ motion to exclude the expert testimony of Robert Johnson, (Doc. 138),1 and Plaintiff Richardson’s motion to exclude the expert testimony of Craig Allen, (Doc. 139). The motions are fully briefed. (Docs. 138, 139, 156, 157, 161, 162.) After careful consideration and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Fred Lauzon v. Senco Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  3. Smith v. Ingersoll-Rand, Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. Smith v. Dorchester Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  5. Lucy Mercado, Individually and as Next Friend of Brian Mercado, a Minor v. Salim Ahmed and Checker Taxi Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API