Legal Opinion
State v. Lozada
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 2001No. 1999-2316PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 74.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. LOZADA, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Lozada,
2001-Ohio-149.] Criminal law—Motor vehicles—During routine traffic stop, it is reasonable for officer to search driver for weapons before placing driver in patrol car, when—During routine traffic stop, it is unreasonable for officer to search driver for weapons before placing driver in patrol car, when. (No. 99-2316—Submitted December 13, 2000—Decided June 20, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Portage County, No. 98-P-0098.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. Leonard, C-060595 (6-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. SchrimlOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. Crowe, 07cac030015 (1-31-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Cleveland v. OlesOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. HollinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.