O'Neill v. Conway
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover damages for alleged fraudulent representations as to the dimensions of land purchased by the plaintiff of the defendant, irought to and tried by the Court of Common Pleas in New London County, Waller, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for $300, and appeal by the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler., J.
We have examined the evidence and are of the opinion that the assignments of error based upon facts claimed to have been i found without evidence, and upon claimed facts which the trial court refused to find, are not well taken.
The action is brought to recover! damages for fraudulent representations concerning the dimensions of a lot of land sold the plaintiff by the defendant. The essential facts of record are:—
The defendant represented to the plaintiff that his lot of land measured on the west or Lafayette Street line 131 feet in length, and the same length on the east line, and measured…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mabardy v. McHughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Scholfield Gear & Pulley Co. v. ScholfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Shell v. . RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Boddy v. HenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Lovejoy v. IsbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clark v. HaggardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Franchey v. HannesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Warman v. DelaneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Nanos v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Smyth Sales, Inc. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.