Legal Opinion

Heethuis v. Kerr

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1917No. Docket No. 87PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Muskegon; Sullivan, J. Bill by Jacob E. Heethuis against William F. Kerr, Charles W. Kerr and others to quiet title to certain real property. Glenn M. Porter and William A. Wyman were later substituted for defendants Kerr and allowed to file an answer and cross-bill. From a decree for plaintiff, defendants bring case-made.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

The bill in this cause was filed January 4, 1912, to quiet title to certain premises in the city of Muskegon, Mich. The parties made defendants were William F. and Charles W. Kerr, the National Savings & Loans Association, John F. Breden and Antha D. Keys. It is charged in the bill that on May 1, 1906, complainant was purchaser at the regular tax sale held in Muskegon of premises .described as lot 1, block 264, of the revised plat of the city of Muskegon, for the taxes of the year 1903, that said premises are also known as lot 1, block 46, of Sanford’s addition to the village (now city) of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. G. F. Sanborn Co. v. AlstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Lewis v. MonsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Pike v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Williams v. OlsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Bolio v. MarvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hauver v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  2. Patterson v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Briggs v. PrevostMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Gustin v. Bonehead Hunting ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Le Boeuf v. PappMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API