Suburban Land Co. v. Inhabitants of Arlington
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtDe Courcy, J.
The petitioner’s land was duly taken by the
respondent for park and water purposes; and the only issue before the jury was the fair market value of the tract taken. All of the exceptions involve questions of evidence.
The land in question was part of a large tract which had been purchased in September, 1912, by two partners under the name of the Suburban Land Company, and was transferred by them to the petitioner on its incorporation in March, 1913. This corporation is engaged in what is known as the land developing business. It purchases large tracts of land, and plots them out into house…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Edmands v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Everson v. Casualty Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Peirson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Pierce v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Bowditch v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Epstein v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Brush Hill Development, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Kornegay v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- State Roads Commission v. WyvillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Brown v. Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.