Miller v. Childs
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Herein is involved the election of a judge of the superior court of Del Norte County. The contest was based upon the declared ineligibility of respondent by reason of certain acts of moral turpitude in violation of the purity of election law and of the fact of his defeat for the nomination at the primary election held on August 25, 1914.
There was suitable averment of the corrupt character of most of said acts- to bring them within the condemnation of the law. If said acts were performed for the purpose and with the motive claimed and averred by appellant, no doubt could be entertained that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Winston v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- People ex rel. Hoyne v. McCormickIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- State ex rel. McCarthy v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
3Cited by8 opinions
- Canales v. City of AlvisoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Markwort v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- French v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- State ex rel. Onstine v. BartlettWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Canales v. City of AlvisoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.