United States v. Langford
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NAUGHTON, Judge:
Appellant was tried by a general court-martial comprised of officer members at *1092Fort Riley, Kansas. He was arraigned on charges alleging rape (three specifications), forcible sodomy (four specifications), the taking of indecent liberties, the commission of lewd and lascivious acts, and assault with intent to commit sodomy, violations of Articles 120, 125, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 925, and 934 (1976), respectively. All of the above offenses were alleged to have been perpetrated by appellant against his two stepdaughters,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
- United States v. SturdivantUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. NeblockU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. JohnsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. NeblockU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. NeblockU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994