United States v. Neblock

I can find no support in law, fact, or logic for the result reached by the majority in this case. In my view, it is just plain wrong!1 If I am right, this decision gives appellant a sentencing windfall which is not warranted by the law, not deserved by the facts, and not understandable through simple logic. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion appellant was twice convicted for the same criminal act and that we must merge the two specifications into one. To reach its result, the majority establishes a completely new way for this Court to view the issue of multiplicity when criminal acts…