Soyka v. Commissioner of Revenue
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRAS, Justice.
The question presented in this case is whether, when the Commissioner of Revenue serves notice of an order by United States mail, Minn. R. Civ. P. 6.05 extends the 60-day statutory deadline for filing an appeal with the Minnesota Tax Court. The tax court dismissed the appeal filed by relator Sharon A. Soyka for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on its conclusion that her notice of appeal was untimely because Rule 6.05 did not extend the time for filing an appeal. We reverse and direct the tax court to reinstate Soyka’s appeal.
I
The Commissioner of Revenue informed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Williams v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Kenzie v. Dalco Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Roehrdanz v. BrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.