Legal Opinion

Jones v. McFarland Co-Op Gin, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 1965No. Civ. 476PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Appellant Jones, an employee of Hardwicke-Etter Company, recovered a $25,013.90 judgment for injuries received while working on equipment at respondent’s gin. Liability of the gin was based upon a violation of its duty as statutory employer to furnish plaintiff a safe place to work. By a judgment notwithstanding verdict, Jones’ recovery was reduced by $6,013.90, the amount of his employer’s lien for workmen’s compensation benefits paid to him. The judgment was reduced upon the ground that Hardwicke-Etter, the direct employer of Jones, was guilty of concurrent negligence, despite the jury’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Conner v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Scott v. John E. Branagh & SonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Truck Insurance Exchange v. StilleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. De Cruz v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Alber v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Souza v. PraticoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Nationwide InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Holliday v. Miles, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API