Legal Opinion
Baker v. Federal Land Bank of Spokane
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 19, 1995No. 93-35321Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
46 F.3d 1138
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Ronald D. BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL LAND BANK OF SPOKANE, aka Interstate Federal Land
Bank, aka Northwest Farm Credit Services; Interstate
Production Credit Association, aka Northwest Farm Credit
Services; Farm Credit Bank of Spokane, a Federal
corporation; Kevin C. Meek, Attorney for Northwest Farm
Credit Services;…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ruth E. Oscar Charles Spinosa v. University Students Co-Operative Association George ProperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Robert P. Wilcox v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Jean L. Richards v. Hal Harper, Max Baucus, and Pat WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Harper v. Federal Land Bank of SpokaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Coles Department Store v. First Bank (N.A.)Montana Supreme Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.