Legal Opinion

Archer v. Whitten

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 9, 1912No. Nos. 17,385—(215)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $1,-470.50 upon an account stated. The answer interposed a counterclaim for $1,948.72. The reply was a general denial. The case was tried before Holt, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $1,552.89. Erom an order denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, he appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.

Action to recover $1,470.50 and interest on an account stated. Defendant denied that an account was stated, and pleaded various defenses and counterclaims, all arising out of the matters between the parties that plaintiff claimed were settled and adjusted by the account stated. The only question submitted to the jury was whether *123the parties adjusted their accounts and differences, and agreed upon the balance struck as the true sum due from defendant. The verdict was in favor of plaintiff, defendant’s motion in the alternative was denied, and he appealed.

The only substantial question here is…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ricker v. J. L. Owens Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. Archer v. WhittenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. In Re Estate of HoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  4. Rydeen v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API