Brighetti v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.
On September 29, 1976, the plaintiff Brighetti was injured when his foot and ankle were mashed by a rotating screw auger that was being used at the time to unload grain from a railroad car. The accident occurred at a siding owned by the defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail), with an oral “lease” to G.D. Poultry, Inc. (Poultry), Brighetti’s employer, to install and operate the auger.
After the plaintiff presented his proof and rested, the defendant chose to rest, and moved for a directed verdict essentially on the ground of insufficient evidence to go to the jury. The judge denied…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mullins v. Pine Manor CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Raunela v. Hertz Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Thornhill v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Young v. GarwackiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Freeman v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Chausse v. CozMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Camerlin v. MarshallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Draper v. Kids "R" UsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
- Agustynowicz v. BradleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.