Legal Opinion

City of Kansas City v. Brady

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 5, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion for Rehearing. The material facts are stated in the original opinion, reported in 52 Kas. 297, et seq., and in the opinion herein, filed May 5, 1894.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.:

*313Fa™eréapto.ion *312A motion for a rehearing has been made in this case, and argued with much earnestness and at great length. It is now urged that the court mistook the facts and overlooked some of the special findings; and the correctness of the legal propositions enunciated in the original opinion herein, reported in 52 Kas. 297, (34 Pac. Rep. 884,) as applied to the facts in this case, is also challenged. The facts will be found in the report of the former decision. It is now urged that, though there is no special finding to that effect, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. CuppySupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Bryant v. Bigelow Carpet Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. City of Kansas City v. BradySupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chicago, Bock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. AndreesenNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Wood v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Mann v. Northeast Kansas Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API