Legal Opinion

Wood v. Union Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 1913No. 17,877PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Riley district court.

1Opinion of the Court

*478The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The plaintiff sued to recover for two horses killed by one of the defendant’s trains. The stock left the land of its owner, went upon the highway and entered upon an adjoining farm over a cattle guard, this farm being fenced according to the finding of the jury. The trial was expressly confined to the allegations of the petition touching the cattle guard, which the testimony showed and the jury found was out of repair. They were instructed that the plaintiff could not recover unless they should find from the evidence that a cattle guard could…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. v. ReesmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  2. Harrington v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. Berry v. St. Louis, Salem & Little Rock R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  4. Peddicord v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  5. Brooks v. New-York & Erie RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1862

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Emery v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe & Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API