Legal Opinion

Kuntz v. Kinne

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1964No. 3244, 3245PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harnsberger

The facts in this matter sufficiently exhibit the nature of the appeal.

• Appellants claim they were injured on August 8, 1959, because of the negligent operation of motor vehicle by deceased, who was killed in the accident. On May 27, 1963, deceased's widow qualified as the administratrix of his estate and on the same day appellants filed their creditors’ claims against the deceased for their injuries. Later the administratrix published the usual notice to creditors. When appellants’ creditors’ claims were rejected, they brought suit against the administratrix. The administratrix moved for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Dunkum v. MacEck Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. McSurely v. McGrewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Carle v. GehlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  5. Brinegar v. ClarkWyoming Supreme Court · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. DeHerrera v. HerreraWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State ex rel. Albany County Weed & Pest District v. Board of the County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Wetering v. EiseleWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Haddenham v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Hamlin v. Transcon LinesWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API