Clift v. . Barrow
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme •Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order made April 21, 1885, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. The nature of the action and the material facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPeokham, J.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff, who alleges that he is the surviving partner of the firm of ■C. Pardee & Co., against George Barrow, the maker of a promissory note dated the 1st of January, 1877, payable one year after date, to the order of C. Pardee, who died on or about the 9th of April, 1878, without having indorsed it. The plaintiff claims that the note is a part of the assets of the firm of C. Pardee & Co., and that, he is the survivor of that ■firm. The defendant put in a general denial.
First. Upon the trial the plaintiff, for the purpose of sus taming his claim to' be the…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Orvis v. . CurtissNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Clemens v. CraneIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Hartley v. . Eagle Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Charles A. Riley Co. v. W. T. Sears & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Leibovici v. RawickiCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.