United States v. Carl E. Brown
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.
Carl E. Brown appeals from his conviction for violation of National Park Regulations prohibiting possession of a loaded firearm and hunting in national parks. The issue presented in this appeal is whether the United States has jurisdiction to enforce regulations controlling activities on waters within the boundaries of Voyageurs National Park. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
The facts are undisputed. On October 7, 1975, Carl E. Brown went duck hunting within the boundaries of Voyageurs National Park in northern Minnesota. While his boat was afloat on a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Kleppe v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Paul v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. SewardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- National Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. Board of State LandsUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Nevada v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Mountain States Legal Foundation v. BushCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- United States v. BouchardDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1978
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.