Legal Opinion

United States v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1955No. 15965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LORD, District Judge.

This action is before the Court on objections of defendant, Paul B. Miller, to an Attachment Sur Judgment. The defendant argues that his wages may not be attached for debt.

Defendants borrowed $3,500 from the United States Department of Agriculture on two Farmer’s Home Loans. They signed Bonds and agreed to repay the debts by installments. Defendants defaulted in their obligations. Efforts to recover full collection were unsuccessful.

On October 23, 1953, Judgment by Confession was entered in this Court. When additional time payments were not forthcoming, the plaintiff, on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. State Bank of NCSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. United States v. HoarU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1821
  4. Dole v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. United States v. NewhardDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Housing Authority of Newark v. SagnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. Housing Authority v. SagnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API