Legal Opinion
Mann v. Fernandez
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided March 20, 2009No. CIV 07-0645 JB/ACTPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion to Reopen Discovery and for Amended Scheduling Order, filed June 24, 2008 (Doc. 47). The Court held a hearing on October 17, 2008. The primary issue is whether Plaintiff Richard Lee Mann’s new counsel has shown good cause to reopen discovery and to amend the scheduling order because his prior counsel, Dennis W. Montoya, allegedly did not conduct adequate discovery before the deadline for discovery expired. During the hearing the issue was narrowed to whether the Court…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- S&w Enterprises, L.L.C., a Nevada Limited Liability Company v. Southtrust Bank of Alabama, Na, an Alabama Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Sil-Flo, Inc. v. SFHC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Davoll v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Skyline Potato Co. v. Tan-O-On Marketing, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Auge v. Stryker CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- Auge v. Stryker CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
- Balderas v. Real Estate Law Center, PCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
- Belgravia Hartford Capital Inc. v. Polynatura CorpDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.