State v. Auld.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
McKENNA, J.
I. Introduction
The primary 1 questions presented in this case are whether the State, in seeking to sentence a defendant to a mandatory minimum sentence as a repeat offender under Hawai'i Revised Statutes (“HRS”) § 706-606.5 (2014) 2 , (1) must include the defen dant’s predicate prior convictions in a charging instrument; and (2) must prove these prior convictions to a jury, beyond a reasonable doubt. We answer both questions in the affirmative.
This appeal surfaces in the wake of the sea change in state sentencing procedure brought on by the United States…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. Tetu.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
- Flubacher v. State.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Loher.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
- Oki v. OrnellasDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2025
- State v. BakerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.