Legal Opinion

State v. Auld.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 2015No. SCWC-13-0002894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

McKENNA, J.

I. Introduction

The primary 1 questions presented in this case are whether the State, in seeking to sentence a defendant to a mandatory minimum sentence as a repeat offender under Hawai'i Revised Statutes (“HRS”) § 706-606.5 (2014) 2 , (1) must include the defen dant’s predicate prior convictions in a charging instrument; and (2) must prove these prior convictions to a jury, beyond a reasonable doubt. We answer both questions in the affirmative.

This appeal surfaces in the wake of the sea change in state sentencing procedure brought on by the United States…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Tetu.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Flubacher v. State.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. Loher.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Oki v. OrnellasDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2025
  5. State v. BakerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API