Legal Opinion

Billson v. Lardner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1896No. Nos. 10,388—(107)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff and by defendant William P. Lardner, assignee, from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Morris, J., made February 21, and filed February 26, 1896, ordering plaintiff to pay to defendants Joseph Wolf and others, copartners as Wolf Brothers’ Bank, the sum of $3,516.61.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

Upon the merits this case is controlled by that of Wolf v. McKinley, 65 Minn. 156, 68 N. W. 3.

Upon the question of. practice it appears that the trial court made its findings of fact and the order thereon on February 6, 1896, and filed the same February 7, 1896. Subsequently, pursuant to an agreement made between the respective attorneys, amended findings and an order thereon were made by the trial court, and substituted for the original findings, the order bearing date February 21, 1896, and filed February 26,1896. There was some controversy as to the extent and materiality of the additional…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wolf v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. E.C.I. Corp. v. G.G.C. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Obradovich v. Walker Bros. BankersUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Zimmern v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API