Wolf v. McKinley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Ensign, J., denying their motion for appointment of a receiver in proceedings supplementary to execution of the unexempt property of William McKinley, judgment debtor.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
The complaint in this action was on file in the clerk’s office more than 20 days after the action was commenced, and before the judgment against defendants for the recovery of money was entered. Thereafter an execution was issued, and returned unsatisfied.- Thereupon an affidavit and order in supplemental proceedings were made, and served on the judgment debtor; and within three days thereafter, to wit, on February 15, 1894, he made an assignment for the benefit of his creditors, under the insolvency law of 1881.2 The question involved in this case is whether the lien on his property acquired…
2Cited by8 opinions
- State v. ArnwineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Lister v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Zaremba v. KonopkaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- State v. PedersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Billson v. LardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.