Legal Opinion

Jocylin E. Kimbler v. The Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 5, 1964No. 14479_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GANEY, Circuit Judge.

In a non-jury FELA action the trial court found the railroad employee and the railroad were equally responsible for the injuries she sustained. 1 On this appeal from the judgment recovered by the employee, the railroad contends that the trial court erred in labeling certain omissions on its part as negligence, and even if its failure to have acted may be properly characterized as negligence, the plaintiff has failed to present the necessary probative facts from which the causal relations between that negligence and her injuries could reasonably be inferred.

There is little…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Raudenbush v. Baltimore & OR Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. McCray v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  3. Louis D. Anderson v. Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  4. Oliver v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1956

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Orie W. Davis v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. Isgett v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971
  3. Meuller v. Jeffrey Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Elston v. Union Pacific RailroadColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Carl Eugene Phillips v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API