United States v. Holly
United States Court of Military Appeals
1DissentQuinn, Chief Judge
I join Judge Darden in his exception to the principal opinion. As to the two particulars on which he agrees with Judge Ferguson for reversal, I am constrained to register my dissent.
While the doctrine of self-defense does not limit the individual to the exercise of exactly the same kind of force as is used against him by an assailant, recourse to a deadly weapon in resisting an assault made without a deadly weapon is excusable only if it appears to be reasonably necessary to prevent death or grievous bodily harm. United States v Regalado, 13 USCMA 480, 33 CMR 12; United States v Gordon, 14…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. RegaladoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. GordonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. StraubUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
- State v. DamuthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- United States v. DejewskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.