Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Holly

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 3, 1969No. 21,582Published

1DissentQuinn, Chief Judge

I join Judge Darden in his exception to the principal opinion. As to the two particulars on which he agrees with Judge Ferguson for reversal, I am constrained to register my dissent.

While the doctrine of self-defense does not limit the individual to the exercise of exactly the same kind of force as is used against him by an assailant, recourse to a deadly weapon in resisting an assault made without a deadly weapon is excusable only if it appears to be reasonably necessary to prevent death or grievous bodily harm. United States v Regalado, 13 USCMA 480, 33 CMR 12; United States v Gordon, 14…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. RegaladoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  2. United States v. GordonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  3. United States v. StraubUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  4. State v. DamuthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. United States v. DejewskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API