Legal Opinion

Peart v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1987PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: An inmate who speaks only Spanish is entitled to select a Spanish-speaking employee assistant so that the nature of disciplinary charges may be explained and the inmate can communicate his requests for witnesses or other evidence (7 NYCRR 251-4.1; Matter of Rivera v Smith, 110 AD2d 1043). Although petitioner’s native language is Spanish, prison officials correctly determined that he was conversant in English and did not require a bilingual assistant. Accordingly, petitioner’s failure to select an assistant from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Law v. RacetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Newman v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clarkson v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. Dawes v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Polanco v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Maldonado v. RacetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Raqiyb v. BartlettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API