Legal Opinion

Brown v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided October 20, 2003No. 015883BLSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

van Gestel, J.

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts has moved in limine seeking an order from this Court precluding the plaintiffs from calling as a trial witness the Commonwealth’s lead trial counsel, First Assistant Attorney General Dean Richlin (“Mr. Richlin”).

Mr. Richlin became employed by the Office of the Attorney General (“AGO”) on January 20, 1999, when he accepted the position of First Assistant. This was after the fee agreements central to this case were executed, after the pendency of the Commonwealth’s action against the cigarette manufacturers, and after the Master Settlement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. ShraiarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Serody v. SerodyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Kendall v. AtkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Byington v. City of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API