Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Foreman v. Hampson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1958No. Appeals, 121 and 122PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Jones,

This action in quo warranto was instituted by James L. Foreman, district attorney of Forest County, as relator, for the purpose of questioning the right of Harold S. Hampson, Esq., to serve as county solicitor. The complainant alleged that, since Hampson is a nonresident of Forest County, his appointment by the com: missioners as county solicitor violates the provisions of Article XIY, Section 3, of the Constitution of Pennsylvania which provides that no person “shall be appointed to any office within any county” unless he has been a citizen and inhabitant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lennox v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Richie v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Finley v. McNairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Alworth v. County of LackawannaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Wiest v. Northumberland Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Stilp v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Ballou v. State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Reese v. DanforthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Smethport Area School District v. BowersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Vega v. BURGETTSTOWN BOROUGH.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API