Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Wiest v. Northumberland Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1934No. Appeal 98PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Tbexleb, P. J.,

On the first Monday of January, 1933, the county controller of Northumberland County appointed W. Irvine Wiest, the plaintiff, as solicitor and on the same day the salary board of said county fixed his salary at $2,400 per annum, payable semi-monthly in installments of $100. The appointment was made by virtue of the Act of May 2, 1929, P. L. 1278, See. 135, which provides: “The county controller may designate and appoint one person learned in the law to act as his solicitor. Such solicitor shall advise upon all such legal matters as may he submitted to him and shall…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MoffittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  2. Tucker's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Alworth v. County of LackawannaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Commonwealth v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Glessner's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ballou v. State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Reese v. DanforthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Foreman v. HampsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Chapman Ex Rel. Chapman v. GerardDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1970
  5. Carson v. City of PhiladelphiaPennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API