Legal Opinion

In Re Douglas P.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 13, 1994No. 39, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

Petitioner Douglas P. challenges the finding that he committed a “delinquent act” by violating Maryland’s child abuse statute. See Maryland Code (1957, 1992 Repl.Vol.), Article 27, § 35A (defining child abuse); Md.Code (1974, 1989 Repl.Vol., 1993 Cum.Supp.), Cts. & Jud.Proc. Art., § 3-801(k) (defining delinquent act). 1 Douglas argues that the child abuse statute is not applicable to juvenile offenders and, thus, a “delinquent act” cannot be based upon conduct constituting child abuse. He sets forth several arguments in support of this position and we shall address each in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. State v. BrickerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Fairbanks v. McCarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Brodsky v. BrodskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. In Re Keith G.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fraternal Order of Police, Montgomery County Lodge No. 35 v. MehrlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Department of Economic & Employment Development v. TaylorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Williams v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Sacchet v. BlanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Claggett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API